Michael Robert Cottrell - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         

          is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should               
          not be cited as authority.                                                  
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $1,652 in                        
          petitioner's Federal income tax for 2000.                                   
               The sole issue for decision is whether petitioner is                   
          entitled to deductions for trade or business expenses under                 
          section 162(a).  The Court's holding on that issue will                     
          determine petitioner's liability for self-employment taxes, a               
          deduction for one-half of such taxes, and petitioner's                      
          entitlement to an earned income credit.                                     
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts, with the              
          annexed exhibits, are so found and are made part hereof.                    
          Petitioner's legal residence at the time the petition was filed             
          was Jefferson City, Missouri.                                               
               During the first 8 months of the year 2000, petitioner was             
          self-employed as a plasterer.  For the last 4 months of the                 
          year, petitioner was an employee, for which he earned wage                  
          income.                                                                     
               For the year 2000, petitioner filed a Federal income tax               
          return, utilizing Form 1040EZ, Income Tax Return for Single and             
          Joint Filers With No Dependents.  On that return, petitioner                
          reported $9,717 in wage and salary income.  He reported no other            
          income.  His return did not include any income or expenses in               
          connection with petitioner's trade or business as a plasterer.              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011