- 3 - Based on information returns filed by third-party payers, respondent determined that petitioner realized income from such payers that was not included on petitioner's income tax return. These payments totaled $5,700. In his petition and at trial, petitioner conceded he had received the payments, and that such payments were for plastering and stucco work he performed during the first 8 months of the year 2000. However, in his petition and at trial, petitioner contended that at least 50 percent of the payments he received went toward materials used on the job, an additional 25 percent went toward subcontracted labor, and, beyond that, the remainder of the payments was offset by "pre- owned capital losses and outstanding debts incurred". Thus, petitioner's position is that he realized no net income from his business activity during the year 2000. At trial, petitioner presented no books and records to substantiate his claimed expenses. He testified that he maintained "fairly good records"; however, those records were lost when he was evicted from his apartment. He made no effort to reconstruct his records for trial of this case. Petitioner contends he paid workers he employed in cash but never exacted receipts from them. Although petitioner contended that he maintained records of these cash payments, those records were lost in the eviction proceeding. Petitioner gave no testimony and presented no documentary evidence regarding the allegationPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011