Michael Robert Cottrell - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         

               Based on information returns filed by third-party payers,              
          respondent determined that petitioner realized income from such             
          payers that was not included on petitioner's income tax return.             
          These payments totaled $5,700.  In his petition and at trial,               
          petitioner conceded he had received the payments, and that such             
          payments were for plastering and stucco work he performed during            
          the first 8 months of the year 2000.  However, in his petition              
          and at trial, petitioner contended that at least 50 percent of              
          the payments he received went toward materials used on the job,             
          an additional 25 percent went toward subcontracted labor, and,              
          beyond that, the remainder of the payments was offset by "pre-              
          owned capital losses and outstanding debts incurred".  Thus,                
          petitioner's position is that he realized no net income from his            
          business activity during the year 2000.                                     
               At trial, petitioner presented no books and records to                 
          substantiate his claimed expenses.  He testified that he                    
          maintained "fairly good records"; however, those records were               
          lost when he was evicted from his apartment.  He made no effort             
          to reconstruct his records for trial of this case.  Petitioner              
          contends he paid workers he employed in cash but never exacted              
          receipts from them.  Although petitioner contended that he                  
          maintained records of these cash payments, those records were               
          lost in the eviction proceeding.  Petitioner gave no testimony              
          and presented no documentary evidence regarding the allegation              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011