William R. and Deborah L. Cramer - Page 11




                                        - 10 -                                        
          sources of Federal Tax law are the statutes, regulations, and               
          judicial decisions; they do not include informal IRS                        
          publications.  See Zimmerman v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 367, 371              
          (1978), affd. 614 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir. 1979).  Accordingly, Dunda             
          may not rely on the IRS publication he reviewed as the reason he            
          failed to attach to his 1998 return a properly completed and                
          signed Form 8332 or a statement conforming to the substance of              
          Form 8332.                                                                  
               Because Dunda did not satisfy the requirements of section              
          152(e)(2), he and his wife are not entitled to claim the                    
          dependency exemption deductions with respect to Charles and                 
          Daniel for 1998.  Because Cramer is the custodial parent and                
          Cramer did not expressly release the dependency exemptions with             
          respect to Charles and Daniel for 1998, Cramer and her husband              
          are entitled to deduct the dependency exemptions for Charles and            
          Daniel for 1998.                                                            
               Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case               
          Division.                                                                   
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             for petitioners in docket No.            
                                             2341-02S.                                
                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             for respondent in docket No.             
                                             2644-02S.                                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  

Last modified: May 25, 2011