- 17 - action. In the determination, the hearing officer must confirm that he or she took into consideration the verification presented under section 6330(c)(1). Sec. 6330(c)(3)(A); sec. 301.6320- 1(e), Proced. & Admin. Regs. In addition, the determination must take into consideration any issues appropriately raised by the taxpayer, offers by the taxpayer for collection alternatives, and whether the disputed collection action represents a balance between the Government’s need for efficient collection of taxes and the taxpayer’s concerns regarding the intrusiveness of the proposed collection action. Sec. 6330(c). If the taxpayer disagrees with the hearing officer’s determination, the taxpayer has the right to seek judicial review of the determination by appealing to this Court or, if this Court lacks jurisdiction over the underlying tax liability, to a Federal District Court. Sec. 6330(d). If the taxpayer files a timely petition for judicial review, the applicable standard of review depends upon whether the underlying tax liability is at issue. Where the underlying tax liability is not at issue, the Court will review the Appeals officer’s determination for abuse of discretion. Sego v. Commissioner, supra at 610. In his amended petition, petitioner enumerates a plethora of “errors” allegedly committed by the Appeals Office in making its determination upholding the nominee lien filed against thePage: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011