- 16 - bar cash register tapes were duplicated on the dinner cash register tapes, thus accounting for the “double-ups” theory upon which petitioner relied to invalidate respondent’s determination of $120,371 of unreported income. In following Mr. Chiate’s leading questions, Mr. Ozenne testified that by analyzing the restaurant’s records from periods other than the applicable period (June 1994 through May 31, 1995) he could prove that the “$120,000” unreported income could be accounted for by showing that there were “double-ups” on the bar and dinner cash register tapes. Mr. Ozenne explained the basis for his double-ups theory as follows: Well, what I did, if you take the IRS’s proposed adjustment of $120,000 and you divide by 365 days, because they were open every day except Christmas and Thanksgiving, you get an average of $328. So our contention is that approximately $328 worth of drinks every day were added to tape two (2) and to tape one (1) which are double counted. Having computed the amount of $328 as the base figure needed to arrive at $120,000,3 Mr. Ozenne then incredibly explained how he arrived at a $328 day double-up: What we did initially is we took the day of July 2nd and we added up all the double counts on that one and it came to $183. Because that was a small group of 3 To be more accurate, Mr. Ozenne should have divided $120,000 by 363 days because the restaurant was closed on Christmas and Thanksgiving Day. He would then have a base figure of $331 to work with, but the Court is confident the discrepancy would not have slowed Mr. Ozenne down.Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011