Duncan & Associates - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          record those amounts in its books and records as dividends or, in           
          the alternative, as compensation to Mr. Duncan.                             
               During 1990 and 1991, respectively, Mr. Duncan made payments           
          or other transfers to or on behalf of petitioner of amounts                 
          totaling $100,900 and at least $58,780.  Those respective amounts           
          represent petitioner’s nontaxable receipts from Mr. Duncan for              
          such years.                                                                 
               At a time not disclosed by the record before September 1992,           
          respondent commenced an examination of petitioner with respect to           
          its taxable years 1990 and 1991.                                            
               At a time not disclosed by the record, petitioner filed                
          Federal income tax (tax) returns for its taxable years 1990 (1990           
          return) and 1991 (1991 return).  In such returns, petitioner                
          reported gross receipts of $454,034 and $453,451, respectively.             
          When petitioner filed its 1990 return and 1991 return, petitioner           
          through Mr. Duncan knew and understood that each such return                
          understated petitioner’s income for each such year.  To illus-              
          trate, in its 1990 return and/or 1991 return, petitioner did not            
          report as income the following:  (1) The forgone interest on Mr.            
          Duncan’s outstanding loan balance with petitioner for 1990 and              
          1991; (2) petitioner’s 1990 amount realized; and (3) petitioner’s           
          1991 check amount.  In addition, petitioner claimed a deduction             
          of $9,610 in its 1990 return for “outside services”.  However, we           
          found above that petitioner paid the $9,610 claimed for “outside            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011