- 16 - must consider the actions of Mr. Duncan, petitioner’s president, corporate secretary, and sole shareholder. The record in this case contains indicia of fraud by petitioner. When petitioner filed its 1990 return and 1991 return, petitioner through Mr. Duncan knew and understood that each such return understated petitioner’s income for each such year. In order to mislead respondent’s examining agents with respect to the understatement of petitioner’s income for its taxable years 1990 and 1991, Mr. Duncan and petitioner’s accoun- tant directed, prepared, and/or caused others to prepare certain false documents that were presented to respondent’s examining agents.8 Moreover, in Mr. Duncan’s March 31, 1998 plea agree- ment, Mr. Duncan acknowledged that he fraudulently and corruptly obstructed and impeded, and endeavored to obstruct and impede, the due administration of the Code by knowingly creating and causing the creation of false and fraudulent documents for the purpose of obstructing and impeding respondent’s examination of petitioner with respect to its taxable years 1990 and 1991 and for the purpose of concealing from respondent the falsity of petitioner’s returns for each such year. In Mr. Duncan’s March 31, 1998 plea agreement, Mr. Duncan further acknowledged that 8On Mar. 24, 1993, Mr. Duncan told respondent’s revenue agents that he and one of petitioner’s employees had participated in the falsification of invoices, receipts, and check register stubs.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011