Jane Gilbert - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
               In deciding whether the payments were alimony, we examine              
          the language of the February 4, 1992, separation instrument to              
          ascertain whether it contains a termination upon death condition,           
          and, if it does not, whether State law supplies such a condition.           
          Hoover v. Commissioner, 102 F.3d 842, 847 (6th Cir. 1996), affg.            
          T.C. Memo. 1995-183; see Gonzales v. Commissioner, supra; see               
          also Cunningham v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-474.                       
               State law determines certain rights of the parties, and                
          Federal law determines the Federal income tax consequences of               
          those rights.  Morgan v. Commissioner, 309 U.S. 78, 80 (1940);              
          Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111 (1930).  The February 4, 1992,                  
          separation instrument does not explicitly order that payments               
          terminate upon Ms. Gilbert’s death, and, thus, we examine                   
          Pennsylvania law to determine whether the payments would                    
          terminate by operation of Pennsylvania law.  Hoover v.                      
          Commissioner, supra at 847.                                                 
               When examining a matter of State substantive law, we will              
          look to a State’s highest court to determine the rights of                  
          parties under State law.  See Estate of Bosch v. Commissioner,              
          387 U.S. 456, 465 (1967).  The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has not           
          decided the narrow legal issue of whether an unallocated support            

               9(...continued)                                                        
          in deciding that the unallocated payments were alimony.                     
          Therefore, those cases provide only limited guidance on the issue           
          before us.                                                                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011