- 15 - divorce in Colorado, which ordered that unallocated support payments continue “until further Order of Court.” We conclude that the provision in issue in Miller, is similar to the provision in issue in the instant case because the unallocated support payments may continue beyond the death of the payee spouse at the discretion of the Pennsylvania court. Consequently, we have no reason to conclude that Mr. Hawley’s obligation to make unallocated support payments under the February 4, 1992, separation instrument terminates upon the death of Ms. Gilbert. See generally Hoover v. Commissioner, 102 F.3d at 848. Accordingly, we hold that Mr. Hawley’s obligation to provide unallocated support to Ms. Gilbert and their children may continue after the death of Ms. Gilbert and consequently hold that subparagraph (D) of section 71(b)(1) has not been satisfied. Having found the unallocated support payments do not constitute alimony, we hold that Ms. Gilbert is not liable for the section 55 alternative minimum tax. We have considered all of the contentions and arguments of the parties that are not discussed herein, and we find them to be without merit, irrelevant, or moot. To reflect the foregoing, Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: May 25, 2011