James and Katie Gill - Page 8




                                        - 7 -                                         
          see also Dixon v. United States, 381 U.S. 68, 72-73 (1965);                 
          McGuire v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 765, 779-780 (1981).                       
          Accordingly, we are left with no alternative but to sustain                 
          respondent’s deficiency determination.                                      
               Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case               
          Division.                                                                   
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              


                                             Decision will be entered                 
                                        for respondent.7                              



















               7 In an action for redetermination of a deficiency, this               
          Court does not generally have jurisdiction over interest.                   
          Accordingly, the decision that we shall enter will speak only to            
          petitioners’ liability for the $577 deficiency in income tax.               
          However, we note that at trial, counsel for respondent                      
          acknowledged that interest on the deficiency will be abated by              
          respondent.                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  

Last modified: May 25, 2011