William T. and Nicole L. Gladden - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          settlement by the parties, on remand to us from the Court of                
          Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, of factual issues relating to the            
          water rights adjustment precludes the application of the                    
          qualified offer provision.                                                  
               In our prior Opinion in this case, Gladden v. Commissioner,            
          112 T.C. 209, 217-226 (1999), also involving the water rights               
          adjustment and the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary               
          judgment, we held in favor of petitioners that, as a matter of              
          law, the water rights owned by petitioners constituted capital              
          assets and the relinquishment thereof by petitioners in exchange            
          for monetary distributions constituted a taxable sale or exchange           
          (capital asset issues).                                                     
               In the same opinion and in the context of the same cross-              
          motions for partial summary judgment, we held in favor of                   
          respondent that, as a matter of law, petitioners were not                   
          entitled to allocate any portion of their cost basis in the                 
          underlying land (which petitioners had acquired prior to                    
          acquiring the water rights) to their tax basis in the water                 
          rights (legal allocation issue). Id. at 226-230.2                           
               Because of our determinations on cross-motions for partial             
          summary judgment of the capital asset issues and of the legal               


          2    The water rights and the land actually were owned by a                 
          partnership in which petitioners had an interest.  For                      
          convenience herein, we refer to the water rights and the land as            
          if owned by petitioners.                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011