William T. and Nicole L. Gladden - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
               The specific statutory language in section 7430(c)(4)(E)               
          reflecting the settlement limitation to the qualified offer                 
          provision provides as follows:                                              

               (ii).  Exceptions.--This subparagraph shall not apply to–-             
                    (I) any judgment issued pursuant to a settlement;                 

               Respondent argues that this statutory language means that              
          the ultimate resolution of a disputed tax adjustment pursuant to            
          “any” settlement disqualifies a taxpayer’s qualified offer from             
          being treated as such.                                                      
               Petitioners contend that the above settlement limitation on            
          qualified offers should not apply where, as in the instant case,            
          a disputed tax adjustment is involved in litigation and is                  
          resolved by settlement between the parties only after a court has           
          decided arguments and issues relating to the adjustment.  Here,             
          petitioners emphasize that the water rights adjustment was                  
          resolved by the parties by settlement only after this Court had             
          rendered its opinion on the capital asset issues and on the legal           
          allocation issue and only after the Court of Appeals for the                
          Ninth Circuit had rendered an opinion on the legal allocation               
          issue, each of which was part and parcel of respondent’s water              
          rights adjustment.                                                          
               In support of their position, petitioners cite the policy              
          underlying the qualified offer provision and respondent’s                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011