- 34 - claimed erosion are in evidence. Respondent disallowed petitioners’ claimed loss in full. Removal of sand on petitioners’ beach lot revealed the ribs of a wrecked vessel on the property several yards from the water’s edge (the wreck). The wreck was covered by sand before Hurricane Georges and was almost fully visible for a period of time after Hurricane Georges. The remains of the wreck included rusted debris. Petitioner did not recover sand from areas where it was deposited by the storm as other property owners in the vicinity had done and as he was permitted to do. The wreck has since been covered by sand and the beach replenished by ocean tides and a beach replenishment program of the City of Gulf Shores, Alabama. Baldwin County changed the coastal construction setback line after Hurricane Georges, thereby limiting the area on the beach lot available for future construction of a new beach house. OPINION 1. Burden of Proof Petitioners generally bear the burden of proving their entitlement to deductions for casualty losses. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Section 7491(a), which applies to examinations commenced after July 22, 1998, places the burden of proof on the Commissioner with regard to certain factual issues. ThePage: Previous 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011