James L. and Sherri R. Goertler - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          of a letter from Mr. Austen to the Ogden examiner dated January             
          29, 2001, purporting to transmit “the documents you requested               
          in your examination”.  Petitioners make no reference to the                 
          January 29, 2001, letter, and respondent claims that he has                 
          been unable to locate in his files any correspondence prior to              
          July 18, 2001, containing the requested documentation.  We infer            
          from the foregoing that respondent did not, in fact, receive the            
          requested documentation prior to July 18, 2001.                             
               Petitioners and Mr. Eddings reached a basis of settlement in           
          October 2001.  Pursuant to that settlement, respondent’s counsel            
          conceded the entire case.                                                   
              Petitioners filed the motion on March 8, 2002.  The costs              
          petitioners seek to recover consist entirely of fees incurred for           
          services performed by Mr. Austen.                                           
                                    Discussion                                        
          I.  Section 7430                                                            
               A.  General Scope                                                      
               Section 7430 provides that a taxpayer may recover reasonable           
          costs, including attorney’s fees, incurred in connection with any           
          tax proceeding (administrative or judicial) against the United              
          States if the taxpayer is the prevailing party in such                      
          proceeding.  Section 7430(c)(4)(B) provides that a taxpayer shall           
          not be treated as the prevailing party in any proceeding if the             
          United States establishes that its position in the proceeding was           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011