- 34 -
abate interest for the remaining periods does not amount to an
abuse of discretion because (1) there were no delays during these
periods, and (2) even if there were, the delays were the result
of general administrative decisions, not respondent’s failure to
perform a ministerial act.
We agree with respondent as to the first period, as to parts
of the second period, and as to the unspecified additional
periods. We agree with petitioners as to part of the second
period.
Page: Previous 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011