- 34 - abate interest for the remaining periods does not amount to an abuse of discretion because (1) there were no delays during these periods, and (2) even if there were, the delays were the result of general administrative decisions, not respondent’s failure to perform a ministerial act. We agree with respondent as to the first period, as to parts of the second period, and as to the unspecified additional periods. We agree with petitioners as to part of the second period.Page: Previous 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011