John J. Green - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
               issued to his address of record and he had not                         
               petitioned the tax court as directed.  The taxpayer had                
               previously requested a transcript of account and was                   
               promised one at the conference.  A transcript of                       
               account was provided to the taxpayer on 10/5/2001.                     
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
               A review of the case history indicates a valid                         
               assessment was made, notice and demand was provided and                
               a neglect or refusal to pay occurred.  * * *                           
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
               The Federal Tax Lien is sustained.  Proper                             
               administrative procedures were followed by Service                     
               personnel.  This recommendation balances the need for                  
               efficient tax administration.                                          
               In response to this notice, petitioner timely filed a                  
          petition with the Tax Court for judicial review pursuant to                 
          section 6330(d)(1)(A).  At the time the petition was filed in               
          this case, petitioner resided in Steger, Illinois.                          
               On the same day petitioner filed the petition, he submitted            
          a “MOTION THAT THE TAX COURT DECLARE INVALID THE IRS                        
          ‘DETERMINATION’ AT ISSUE”.  As grounds for this motion,                     
          petitioner asserted that “the appeals officer issued the                    
          ‘Determination’ without conducting the CDP [collection due                  
          process] hearing in accordance with the law.”  This motion was              
          filed by the Court as a motion to dismiss for lack of                       
          jurisdiction.                                                               











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011