- 7 - form to make an assessment, it did not constitute a signed summary record of assessment); Crow v. Commissioner, supra (the taxpayer argued that: (1) The Appeals officer failed to obtain verification from the Secretary that the requirements of any applicable law or administrative procedure were met; (2) the Appeals officer failed to identify the statutes making the taxpayer liable for Federal income tax; (3) the taxpayer was denied the opportunity to challenge (a) the appropriateness of the collection action, and (b) the existence or amount of his underlying tax liability; and (4) the determination at issue was invalid because the Appeals officer failed to establish due process); and Newman v. Commissioner, supra (the taxpayers argued that: (1) The Appeals officer failed to obtain verification from the Secretary that the requirements of any applicable law or administrative procedure were met; (2) the Appeals officer failed to identify the statutes making the taxpayers liable for Federal income taxes; (3) the taxpayers were denied the opportunity to challenge (a) the appropriateness of the collection action, and (b) the existence or amount of their underlying tax liabilities; and (4) the determination at issue was invalid because the Appeals officer issued the determination without conducting aPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011