Green Forest Manufacturing Inc. - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
               Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to              
          sections of the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at            
          issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of                
          Practice and Procedure.                                                     
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.1              
          The stipulations of the parties, with accompanying exhibits, are            
          incorporated herein by this reference.  At the time the petition            
          was filed, petitioner’s principal office was located in San                 
          Diego, California.                                                          
          I.  Petitioner’s Operations                                                 
               Petitioner is engaged in the business of assembling,                   
          manufacturing, and selling furniture.  The dispute in this case             
          relates to the depreciation of several items of equipment                   
          (Equipment) owned by petitioner.  Each item of the Equipment was            
          placed in service after 1986.  For each year petitioner owned the           
          Equipment, the number of days each item of the Equipment was                
          physically located outside the United States exceeded the number            


               1  The parties stipulated various facts relating to the                
          equipment at issue in this case.  Paragraphs 4, 7, and 10 of the            
          “STIPULATION OF FACTS” describe the equipment at issue in this              
          case.  In referring to the paragraphs describing the equipment at           
          issue in this case, the parties mistakenly refer to paragraphs 4,           
          7, and 9.  Paragraph 9 does not describe any equipment at issue             
          in this case.  The references to paragraph 9 appear to be a                 
          repeated typographic error.  As such, references in the                     
          “STIPULATION OF FACTS” to paragraph 9 will be treated as if the             
          references were to paragraph 10.                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011