- 4 - of days that each item was physically located within the United States. During the time petitioner owned the Equipment, it was used to assemble or manufacture furniture. The foreign business using the Equipment was not subject to U.S. Federal income tax. Petitioner sold the furniture that was manufactured using the Equipment. II. Petitioner’s Accounting For all relevant years, petitioner used the accrual method of accounting. On its Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return, for each of the relevant years, petitioner depreciated each item of the Equipment using either the double-declining balance method or the straight line method. For each item petitioner depreciated using the double-declining balance method, petitioner used either a 3-year or a 5-year recovery period. For each item petitioner depreciated using the straight line method, petitioner used a 5-year recovery period. Respondent examined petitioner’s returns for each of the relevant years and issued a notice of deficiency with respect to those years. Therein, respondent determined that petitioner’s deductions for depreciation of items of the Equipment for the relevant years must be decreased because petitioner failed to compute depreciation using the alternative depreciation system for tangible property used predominantly outside the United States, as required under section 168(g)(1)(A). Respondent alsoPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011