Charles Wendell Harkey, Sr. and Barbara Anne Harkey - Page 6

                                        - 5 -                                         
          1994, respondent sent petitioners a notice of balance due,                  
          informing them that they had a liability for 1993 and requesting            
          that they pay it.  Petitioners have made no payments to their               
          account for 1993.                                                           
               C.  Collection-related Matters at the Administrative Level             
               On December 17, 2001, respondent sent petitioners a Final              
          Notice/Notice Of Intent To Levy And Notice Of Your Right To A               
          Hearing in respect of their outstanding tax liabilities for 1992            
          and 1993.                                                                   
               On January 10, 2002, petitioners filed with respondent Form            
          12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing.  The request           
          stated only that “I have never recieved [sic] notice of this                
          tax”.                                                                       
               On July 10, 2002, an administrative hearing was conducted by           
          respondent’s Appeals Office in Atlanta, Georgia.  At the                    
          administrative hearing, petitioners repeated their assertion that           
          they had not received any notice that there was tax due for                 
          either 1992 or 1993.  Petitioners also stated that they did not             
          have any income tax liability for either of those years.                    
               Also discussed at the administrative hearing was an                    
          installment agreement.  Such collection alternative did not prove           
          to be feasible, however, because (as explained by the Appeals               
          officer in his Case Memo) petitioners “[reserved] the right to              
          dispute the tax for the 1992 and 1993 tax year[s].”                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011