Charles Wendell Harkey, Sr. and Barbara Anne Harkey - Page 14

                                       - 13 -                                         
               D.  Conclusion                                                         
               For the reasons discussed above, respondent’s determination            
          to proceed by levy with the collection of petitioners’                      
          outstanding liabilities for 1992 and 1993 should be sustained,              
          and we so hold.                                                             
               Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case               
          Division.                                                                   
               To give effect to the foregoing,                                       


                                             Respondent’s Motion For                  
                                        Summary Judgment will be denied as            
                                        moot, and decision will be entered            
                                        for respondent.                               
























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  

Last modified: May 25, 2011