- 45 - e. Internal Inconsistency Evidence of an internal inconsistency in the determination of employee compensation may indicate the presence of unreasonable compensation to employee-shareholders. Elliotts, Inc. v. Commissioner, 716 F.2d at 1247. Such evidence may also be “probative of a presence or absence of compensatory intent.” Id. at n.7. In addition, “salaries paid to controlling shareholders are open to question if, when compared to salaries paid nonowner management, they indicate that the level of compensation is a function of ownership, not corporate management 6(...continued) attached to the copy of the return in evidence. Moreover, because petitioner’s equity remained essentially constant while its sales and assets increased, ROE does not appear to be an appropriate measure of shareholder return in this case. For example, comparing 1988-90 with the audit years (1995- 97), average yearend equity increased only 4 percent whereas average sales increased 129 percent and average yearend assets increased 215 percent. Under such circumstances, it would appear that either ROA or ROS would be superior to ROE as a measure of performance. For the audit years, both ROA and ROS were quite low (average ROA was .9 percent and average ROS was .27 percent). Alternatively, ROE might be an appropriate measure of performance if petitioner’s fair market value were substituted for “book” equity. In that connection, we note that book equity has not always been used in computing return on equity. See Lumber City Corp. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-171 (holding that the amount paid by the employee-shareholder for a stock interest in his employer, rather than book shareholder equity, was appropriate for use in determining whether return on investment was sufficient to satisfy an independent investor). That alternative approach is not available in this case because, aside from Mr. Carey’s admitted speculation that petitioner was worth between $12 million and $20 million, there is no evidence as to petitioner’s fair market value during the audit years.Page: Previous 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011