- 6 - old section 931 on which petitioner is relying provided that the term “possession of the United States” included Johnston Island.5 Section 1272(a) of the TRA 1986 amended old section 931 to exclude from income, in the case of an individual who is a bona fide resident of a “specified possession” during the entire taxable year, gross income derived from sources within any such “specified possession”. Section 931, as amended by section 1272(a) of the TRA 1986 and as in effect for the year at issue here, defines the term “specified possession” to mean only Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Sec. 931(c). In Specking v. Commissioner, 117 T.C. 95 (2001), affd. sub nom. Haessly v. Commissioner, __ Fed. Appx. __ (9th Cir., June 16, 2003), we addressed the precise argument under section 1.931- 1, Income Tax Regs., that petitioner advances in the instant case. We concluded in Specking: Petitioners’ reliance on section 1.931-1, Income Tax Regs., is misplaced. The regulatory language on which petitioners rely defines the term “possession” for purposes of old section 931. As we have concluded above, that provision no longer applies to petitioners. Consequently, the regulatory provision also has no 5Sec. 1.931-1, Income Tax Regs., provided in pertinent part: � 1.931-1. Citizens of the United States and domestic corporations deriving income from sources within a possession of the United States.--(a) Definitions.-- (1) As used in section 931 and this section, the term “possession of the United States” includes American Samoa, Guam, Johnston Island, Midway Islands, the Panama Canal Zone, Puerto Rico, and Wake Island. * * * [Emphasis added.]Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011