Andras Hautzinger - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          ment for the year at issue.  See sec. 6664(c)(1).  On the record            
          before us, we find that petitioner has failed to establish that             
          he is not liable for the year at issue for the accuracy-related             
          penalty under section 6662(a).8                                             
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                             Decision will be entered for             
                                        respondent.                                   






















               8We have found that petitioner is liable for the year at               
          issue for the accuracy-related penalty under sec. 6662(a) because           
          of negligence or disregard of rules or regulations under sec.               
          6662(b)(1).  In light of that finding, we shall not address                 
          respondent’s alternative argument that petitioner is liable for             
          the year at issue for the accuracy-related penalty under sec.               
          6662(a) because of a substantial understatement of income tax               
          under sec. 6662(b)(2).                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  

Last modified: May 25, 2011