-4- taxes are Code Sections 6001, 6011, and 6012 and none of them identifies any statute which makes me “liable” for income taxes, requires me “to pay” such a tax; or requires me to accurately “self-assess” myself with any such tax. * * * * * * * Code Section 6011 states, “When required by regulation ... any person made liable for any tax...” shall do certain things. However, like Code Section 6001, Section 6011 does not even mention income taxes, let alone identify any regulation that “requires” me to do anything with respect to income taxes. * * * * * * * And Code Section 6012 does not even contain the word “liability”, “liable”, or “self-assessment”; therefore, this section can have nothing to do with making me “liable” for income taxes or putting me on notice that I required [sic] to “self-assess” myself. * * * * * * * In addition your letter claiming that I had filed a “frivolous” income tax return made no mention at all of my claims (let alone refute them) that: 1. No Section of the Internal Revenue Code makes me “liable” for income taxes. 2. “Income” is not defined in the Code. 3. The Supreme Court defined “income” as being a corporate profit. And 4. Since I know the constitutional definition of “income”, if I were to swear under penalty of perjury to receiving anything other than “zero” income, I would be swearing falsely, and thus I would be committing perjury under at least two statutes. On October 15, 2001, respondent sent to petitioner a letter informing him about changes which respondent proposed to make to petitioner’s 1999 return. These changes included the unreportedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011