- 5 - ROBERT HOGUE presented a Trust instrument for the court which is a Contractual Contract Trust based on common law & the United States Constitution, Article One, Section 10., MR. HOGUE also presented notarized documentation to the court to show his acceptance of Trusteeship. As well as further documentation such as form 56, Fiduciary Signature card showing Robert Hogue as wet signature on bank account. At best this site is frivolous and without merit. The court is trying to mislead the petitioner in this court action. ROBERT HOGUE is the only person who can represent the trust. His description as Trustee for Home Health is well established in his everyday work as Trustee. Attached to the objection are copies of, inter alia, a purported trust instrument dated May 24, 1994 (trust instrument), a document entitled “Trustee Resignation/Appointment of Successor-Trustee” executed on July 15, 1997, wherein a Douglas J. Carpa, “trustee”, purportedly appoints Robert Hogue as the successor trustee for Home Health (appointment document),5 an undated document entitled “Letter of Resignation” (resignation letter), documents entitled “Monthly Management Meeting” 5 The same trust instrument and appointment document were both submitted to the Court by Robert Hogue in Home Health Servs. Trust v. Commissioner, docket No. 9118-00, involving the 1996 tax year, which was dismissed on the ground that Robert Hogue was not a proper person authorized to petition the Court on behalf of the trust. Likewise, with the exception of the name of the so-called trust, the appointment document is identical to the appointment document submitted to the Court by Robert Hogue in numerous cases before this Court that were dismissed on the ground that Robert Hogue was not a proper person authorized to petition the Court on behalf of the “trust”. See Rancho Residential Facility Trust v. Commissioner, docket No. 9120-00; Residential Mgmt. Servs. Trust v. Commissioner, docket No. 9119-00 (involving the 1996 tax year); Home Health Servs. Trust v. Commissioner, docket No. 9118- 00; Sunshine Trust v. Commissioner, docket No. 9117-00; Residential Mgmt. Servs. Trust v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001- 297 (involving the 1995 tax year); cases cited supra n.2.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011