Herschel H. and Roberta S. Hoopengarner - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         
          indebtedness income at the time of the foreclosures.  Nor have              
          they proven that any of the claimed NOLs were not reduced by                
          section 108(b)(1) and (b)(2).                                               
               For the aforementioned reasons, petitioners did not                    
          substantiate their claimed net operating losses for the taxable             
          years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999.                               
          B.   Petitioners Failed To Address Claimed Schedule C Expenses              
               Petitioners reported income and expense for Insurance                  
          Service on Schedule C of the 1994 and 1995 tax returns.                     
          Respondent disallowed certain Schedule C expenses. Petitioners’             
          briefs fail to address this issue.  We conclude that petitioners            
          have conceded the uncontested items and abandoned this issue.               
          See Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661, 683 (1989); Money v.             
          Commissioner, 89 T.C. 46, 48 (1987).                                        
          C.   Late-Filed Return for 1995                                             
               Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for an               
          addition to tax pursuant to section 6651(a)(1) for 1995.  Section           
          6651(a)(1) imposes an addition to tax for failure to file a                 
          return on the date prescribed (determined with regard to any                
          extension of time for filing), unless the taxpayer can establish            
          that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to                 
          willful neglect.  The taxpayer has the burden of proving the                
          addition is improper.  See Rule 142(a); United States v. Boyle,             
          469 U.S. 241, 245 (1985).                                                   






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011