Joseph Jones - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          participants to apply for loans from their TESPHE accounts                  
          subject to the plan’s repayment provisions.  If the participant             
          does not comply with TESPHE’s loan repayment provisions, then the           
          outstanding loan balance will be deemed a distribution subject to           
          Federal income taxes and any applicable early withdrawal                    
          penalties.                                                                  
               Between 1989 and 1995, petitioner borrowed funds from his              
          TESPHE account as follows:                                                  
                    Date                      Amount                                  
                    September 30, 1989       $9,300                                   
                    August 31, 1993          16,500                                   
                    May 31, 1994             8,800                                    
                    February 28, 1995         5,300                                   
                    Total                    39,900                                   
          Fidelity did not report any of these loans made to petitioner as            
          deemed distributions from his TESPHE account subject to Federal             
          income taxes.  Likewise, petitioner did not include any of the              
          loan proceeds on his Federal income tax return for the 1989,                
          1993, 1994, or 1995 taxable year.  Petitioner repaid the loans              
          according to TESPHE’s loan provisions.                                      
               Prior to residing in Georgia, petitioner lived with his                
          former wife in their jointly owned residence in Detroit,                    
          Michigan.  Petitioner and his former wife purchased their                   
          Michigan residence in 1985.  During 1997, petitioner separated              
          from his former wife.  In 1998 petitioner was transferred by Ford           
          and moved to Georgia.  Petitioner started construction on his               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011