Curtis B. Keene - Page 19

                                       - 19 -                                         
          acknowledged that, if the Court should decide the section                   
          7521(a)(1) issue in petitioner’s favor, this case should be                 
          remanded in order to permit a recorded hearing.  In Kemper, the             
          pleadings were not narrow in scope, and the Court was able to               
          address all of the nonsection 7521(a)(1) issues pleaded by the              
          taxpayers without the need for remanding the case to develop such           
          issues at an Appeals Office hearing.                                        
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  An appropriate order                
                                             will be issued.                          
               Reviewed by the Court.                                                 
               WELLS, GERBER, COLVIN, HALPERN, LARO, FOLEY, VASQUEZ, GALE,            
          THORNTON, MARVEL, HAINES, GOEKE, and WHERRY, JJ., agree with this           
          majority opinion.                                                           
























Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011