- 14 - to the fact that the payments were loans until the character of the payments was resolved on December 22, 1994. Based on this theory, petitioner contended that the income was properly reported on petitioner’s 1995 Federal income tax return because the resolution of its character occurred in Winston’s fiscal year ended January 31, 1995. OPINION This controversy concerns the proper reporting of settlement payments received by petitioner in connection with his severance and/or being relieved from his position as a partner in a law firm. Petitioner contends that the $116,000 was paid to him to settle a personal injury claim and is excludable from income under section 104(a)(2). Respondent contends that the payment was in consideration of petitioner’s severance from the law firm and not in settlement of a tort claim. A second issue concerns whether payments totaling $48,420 received by petitioner prior to the final settlement were nontaxable loans or taxable advances. Finally, we must decide whether petitioners are liable for an accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a). I. Is The $116,000 Settlement Payment Excludable From Gross Income Under Section 104(a)? A. General Rules “[E]xcept as otherwise provided”, gross income for thePage: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011