- 6 - In 1991, a former client, Terry Stokke, sued petitioner for allegedly committing fraud with respect to a pooled investment. Petitioner settled the lawsuit in 1992 for $39,000 and reported this amount as a Schedule C expense on their 1992 tax return. At the time the petition was filed, petitioners resided in Spokane, Washington. OPINION I. Jurisdiction On October 18, 2000, the Court filed petitioners’ Motion To Dismiss “Wages” Issue In 1992 For Lack Of Jurisdiction, in which petitioners contended that Western’s 1995 payment of $22,583.20 in income tax withholding discharged petitioners’ tax liability relating to petitioners’ 1992 unreported wages. We disagree. Congress has specifically given this Court jurisdiction to redetermine a deficiency if a valid notice of deficiency has been issued and a petition has been timely filed. Secs. 6212(a), 6213(a), and 6214(a); Rule 13(a), (c); Monge v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 22, 27 (1989); Normac, Inc. v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 142, 147 (1988). Therefore, petitioners’ motion will be denied. Petitioners further contend that the notice of deficiency is invalid because respondent did not make a determination. In support of their position, petitioners state that “the unexplained arrows and rounding of * * * [the amounts of the deficiencies] indicate vagueness.” In the notice, respondentPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011