- 7 - OPINION A. Contentions of the Parties and Background Petitioners contend that all of the $839,000 payment is excludable from gross income as damages for personal injuries under section 104(a)(2) and that none is includable in income as interest. Respondent contends that $255,983 of the $839,000 settlement is interest includable as income under section 61(a)(4). We agree with respondent for reasons discussed below. Petitioners bear the burden of proving that they may exclude the $839,000 LPCF payment from income under section 104(a)(2).2 Rule 142(a)(1). Gross income does not include damages received (whether by suit or agreement) on account of personal injuries or sickness. Sec. 104(a)(2).3 However, interest received on damage awards for personal injuries is not received on account of personal injuries or sickness and is not excludable from income under section 104(a)(2). Rozpad v. Commissioner, 154 F.3d 1, 6-7 (1st Cir. 1998), affg. T.C. Memo. 1997-528; Brabson v. United States, 73 2 Petitioners do not contend that respondent bears the burden of proving that sec. 104(a)(2) does not apply. Rule 142(a)(1). 3 The Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-188, sec. 1605(a), 110 Stat. 1838, amended sec. 104(a)(2) to limit the exclusion to amounts received for personal physical injuries or physical sickness. The amount at issue in this case was received before the effective date of the amendment, and, thus, the amended version of sec. 104(a)(2) does not apply.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011