Charles T. McCord, Jr. and Mary S. McCord, Donors - Page 28

                                       - 116 -                                        
               3.   Each Step of the Transaction Is Part of an Integrated             
                    Transaction                                                       

               All of the steps which were taken to effect the transfer of            
          petitioners’ partnership interests to their sons (inclusive of              
          the trusts) were part of a single integrated transaction.  The              
          purpose of that transaction was to transfer the interests with an           
          avoidance of Federal gift taxes, while, at the same time,                   
          discouraging audit of the transfer and manufacturing phantom                
          charitable gift and income tax deductions in the event that the             
          value of the transfer was later increased.  I reach my conclusion           
          in light of the following facts which were found by the trial               
          judge or are reasonable inferences therefrom:  (1) Petitioners              
          were seeking expert advice on the transfer of their wealth with             
          minimal tax consequences, (2) the transaction contemplated that             
          the charities would be out of the picture shortly after the gift            
          was made, (3) the transfers of the partnership interests to the             
          charities were subject to a call provision that could be                    
          exercised at any time, (4) the call provisions were exercised               
          almost contemporaneously with the transfers to the charities,               
          (5) the call price was significantly below fair market value,               
          (6) the charities never obtained a separate and independent                 
          appraisal of their interests (including whether the call price              
          was actually the fair market value of those interests),                     
          (7) neither charity ever had any managerial control over the                
          partnership, (8) the charities agreed to waive their arbitration            







Page:  Previous  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011