- 6 -
On February 4, 2002, respondent filed an answer. In the
answer, respondent denied all of petitioner’s assignments of
error, including that petitioner was the natural father of the
two claimed dependents.
On June 24, 2002, petitioner filed a motion for summary
judgment on the ground that petitioner is the natural father of
Lilly Phan and Anna Phan and that he is otherwise properly
entitled to the head of household filing status and the claimed
dependency exemptions, earned income credit, and child tax
credit.
On August 20, 2002, respondent filed with the Court a notice
of objection to petitioner’s motion for summary judgment,
together with a supporting memorandum. In the objection,
respondent maintained that petitioner had failed to substantiate
that he was entitled to the head of household filing status and
to the claimed deductions and credits.
On August 23, 2002, respondent requested a certified copy
from the Registrar of Vital Records for the State of Maryland of
any documents filed by petitioner with respect to the paternity
of Lilly Phan and Anna Phan.
On August 26, 2002, respondent received certified copies of
the Affidavits of Parentage and birth certificates from the State
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011