Bill Max Overton - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          lists on Schedule E, Supplemental Income and Loss, $32,683 of               
          “Royalties received & interest”, offset by $81,556 of claimed               
          expenses.  On the 1998 purported return, petitioner lists no                
          earned income but claims a “1997 loss carry over” of $407,246, a            
          $3,783,344 earned income credit, and a refund of the same amount.           
          In the jurat above his signature, petitioner scratched out the              
          words “Under penalty of perjury.”3                                          
               With respect to each of petitioner’s 1996, 1997, and 1998              
          tax years, respondent prepared a “substitute for return” (SFR).4            

               3 Petitioner claims to have filed with the Internal Revenue            
          Service (IRS) similar purported returns for his tax years 1996              
          and 1997.  The 1996 purported return, which is in evidence, lists           
          on Schedule E, Supplemental Income and Loss, $39,648 of                     
          “Royalties received & interest”, offset by $78,915 of claimed               
          expenses.  On the 1996 purported return, petitioner lists no                
          earned income and claims a “1995 loss carry over” of $325,372, a            
          $517,146 earned income credit, and a $517,305 refund.  Similarly,           
          the 1997 purported return, which is also in evidence, lists on              
          Schedule E $36,859 of “Royalties received & interest”, offset by            
          $79,466 of claimed expenses.  On the 1997 purported return,                 
          petitioner lists no earned income and claims a “1996 loss carry             
          over” of $364,639, a $1,833,156 earned income credit, and a                 
          $1,833,719 refund.                                                          
               On each of these purported 1996 and 1997 returns, as on his            
          purported 1998 return, petitioner scratched out the words “Under            
          penalty of perjury” in the jurat above his signature.  There is             
          no evidence in the record that petitioner ever submitted the                
          purported 1996 and 1997 returns to the IRS.                                 
               Pursuant to sec. 6702, respondent assessed a frivolous                 
          return penalty with respect to petitioner’s purported 1998                  
          return.  The frivolous return penalty is not at issue here.                 
               4 The term “substitute for return” (SFR) has been used to              
          describe a return prepared by the Commissioner pursuant to sec.             
          6020(b) where the taxpayer did not file a return.  It is                    
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011