- 5 - trial. Accordingly, we regard this case as submitted by the parties. See Rule 149(a).6 A. Unreported Interest Income The evidence shows that petitioner received interest income in amounts at least as great as determined in the notices of deficiency. In fact, by his own admissions in his petition, petitioner received more interest income than was determined in the notices of deficiency. Respondent has not sought increased deficiencies based on these admissions. Therefore, we sustain respondent’s deficiency determinations.7 6 RULE 149. FAILURE TO APPEAR OR TO ADDUCE EVIDENCE (a) Attendance at Trials: The unexcused absence of a party or a party’s counsel when a case is called for trial will not be ground for delay. The case may be dismissed for failure properly to prosecute, or the trial may proceed and the case be regarded as submitted on the part of the absent party or parties. The parties have not addressed the application of sec. 7491 or whether the examination of petitioner’s 1996 or 1997 tax year commenced after July 22, 1998, the effective date of sec. 7491. See RRA 1998 sec. 3001(c), 112 Stat. 727. (Because petitioner’s 1998 return was due after July 22, 1998, presumably, the examination of petitioner’s 1998 tax year commenced after July 22, 1998.) Nevertheless, sec. 7491 does not affect our analysis for any of the years at issue because, with the one exception discussed infra note 7, our holdings do not depend upon which party has the burden of proof or production. 7 In his petition, petitioner claims entitlement to all the deductions listed on his purported returns. Petitioner has not substantiated any of these deductions and accordingly is not entitled to them. See Rule 142(a); New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U.S. 435, 440 (1934). Because petitioner failed to comply with the substantiation and record-keeping requirements (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011