Stephen P. Pacileo - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $3,459 in petitioner’s           
          1998 Federal income tax and a section 6662(a) penalty of $691.80.           
          The issues for decision are:  (1) Whether petitioner is entitled            
          to a theft loss deduction; (2) whether petitioner is entitled to            
          any deductions claimed on a Schedule C, Profit or Loss From                 
          Business, included with his 1998 Federal income tax return; and             
          (3) whether the underpayment of tax required to be shown on                 
          petitioner’s 1998 Federal income tax return is due to negligence.           
          Background                                                                  
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.  At           
          the time the petition was filed petitioner resided in Pasadena,             
          Texas.                                                                      
               Petitioner is a certified welder.  As such, he has been                
          certified by various professional organizations as qualified to             
          perform and supervise certain types of welds and welding                    
          procedures.  During 1998 he was employed by and worked 50 to 60             
          hours per week for Union Tank Car Company (Union).                          
               Prior to the year in issue, petitioner obtained a U.S.                 
          patent (the patent) on a device used in certain welding                     
          operations.  Over the years, petitioner attempted (apparently               
          unsuccessfully), through various business relationships, to                 
          generate income from the patent.  As of the beginning of 1998,              
          however, it is unclear whether petitioner held any rights in the            
          patent.                                                                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011