- 12 - the litigation. Robinson v. Commissioner, supra at 127. If a settlement is attributable to claims based on tort or tort type rights as well as other rights, it may be necessary to determine which portion of the settlement is attributable to damages received based on tort or tort type rights. Similarly, it may be necessary to determine which portion, if any, of the settlement may be attributable to damages received for personal physical injuries or physical sickness. In the instant case, we address first the question of whether the $7,650 settlement payment was received on account of a personal physical injury or physical sickness, if any. That is because a resolution of this question in respondent’s favor controls the disposition of the issue before us. Petitioners would have this Court conclude that Heartland paid the $7,650 settlement payment to Mrs. Prasil because she suffered a “physical sickness”; i.e., she got very ill and her Sweet’s syndrome worsened as a result of “the abuse that she took from this man [Mr. Lakner] down at work” such that she had to be hospitalized and could not walk. However, Mrs. Prasil admitted that she suffered from a preexisting medical condition prior to employment with Heartland, and there is no comparative evidence of the nature of her condition before, during, or after employment with Heartland to determine the nature of Mrs. Prasil’s sickness, let alone the cause of her sickness. In fact,Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011