Irwin and Jeannine Radnitz - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         

          is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not           
          be cited as authority.                                                      
               Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal             
          income taxes of $799 and $1,536, respectively, for 1997 and 1998.           
          After concessions by respondent, the issues for decision are:               
          (1) Whether, under section 280A(c), petitioners are entitled to             
          deductions for office expenses for the years at issue in                    
          connection with the use of their home and two rental apartments             
          in their respective trade or business activities in excess of               
          amounts allowed by respondent, and (2) whether section 280A(c)(5)           
          is unconstitutional as applied to petitioners.2                             
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts, with the              
          annexed exhibits, are so found and are made part hereof.                    
          Petitioners’ legal residence at the time the petition was filed             
          was San Luis Obispo, California.                                            
               Petitioners were married during the years at issue.   From             
          January through August 1997, they resided at a Vista Loma address           
          in Rancho Mirage, California.  In August 1997, petitioners moved            
          from the Vista Loma address to a Deepak Street address in Palm              
          Springs, California.  Petitioners resided at the Deepak address             


               2    At trial, respondent conceded the deductibility of a              
          $376 tuxedo rental expense and a $625 furniture expense for 1997.           
          Petitioners conceded a foreign royalties issue for 1997.  Another           
          adjustment involving taxable Social Security benefits is a                  
          computational adjustment.                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011