River City Ranches #1 Ltd., Leon Shepard, Tax Matters Partner - Page 34

                                       - 19 -                                         
          Court litigation, IRS personnel either strongly suspected or                
          believed these partnerships to be abusive tax shelters.  The                
          IRS’s original position had been that the purported acquisitions            
          of breeding animals by the cattle and sheep partnerships lacked             
          economic substance (i.e., were economic shams), that the                    
          partnerships’ stated purchase prices for the animals greatly                
          exceeded the fair market value of the animals, and that the                 
          promissory note each partnership issued in connection with its              
          purported acquisition of breeding animals was not a valid                   
          indebtedness.                                                               
               The holding in Bales v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-568,             
          however, set back considerably the IRS’s tax enforcement efforts            
          against Jay Hoyt and the cattle and sheep partnerships that he              
          promoted and operated under his tax shelter program.  In Bales,             
          this Court did not sustain the IRS’s disallowance of many of the            
          tax benefits a number of partners in specific cattle partnerships           
          involved therein claimed for 1977, 1978, and 1979.  This Court,             
          among other things, found that the Bales partnerships had                   
          acquired the benefits and burdens of ownership with respect to              
          specific breeding cattle, that the purchase prices for the                  
          partnership cattle did not exceed their fair market value, and              
          that the promissory notes these partnerships issued were valid              
          recourse indebtedness.                                                      








Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011