- 14 - evidence, id. at 875, which includes the various indicia or badges of fraud relied upon by the courts, see Bradford v. Commissioner, 796 F.2d 303, 307 (9th Cir. 1986), affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-601; DiLeo v. Commissioner, supra at 875. A combination of several badges of fraud constitutes persuasive circumstantial evidence of fraud. Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 211 (1992); Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661, 700 (1989). Respondent has established that petitioner underpaid his income tax for each of the years at issue. The bank deposits analysis reflects substantial deposits into petitioner’s bank accounts for each year. The record contains substantial credible evidence that the deposits were income to petitioner. When this fact is coupled with the uncontested fact that petitioner was required to file but failed to file tax returns for the years at issue, we find that the record contains clear and convincing proof that petitioner underpaid his income tax for each of the years at issue. Respondent’s proof that petitioner’s underpayments are attributable to fraud consists primarily of petitioner’s deemed admissions. We have held that deemed admissions are sufficient to satisfy the Commissioner’s burden of proof with respect to the issue of fraud. See Doncaster v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 334, 336- 338 (1981). According to respondent, petitioner’s deemed admissions establish the following indicia or badges of fraud for all yearsPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011