- 18 - History of Income or Losses A record of substantial losses over several years may be indicative of the absence of a profit motive. Golanty v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 411, 426 (1979), affd. without published opinion 647 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1981). Section 1.183-2(b)(6), Income Tax Regs., provides, however, that if losses are sustained because of unforeseen or fortuitous circumstances which are beyond the control of the taxpayer, such losses would not be an indication that the activity is not engaged in for profit. We conclude that the losses sustained were the result of unforeseen circumstances and are not an indication that the activity is not engaged in for profit. Those unforeseen circumstances include: (1) Congressional investigations into the pharmaceutical industry which deterred sponsorships to petitioners by the industry; (2) the adverse effect of the luxury tax on the sailboat industry in the 1990s; and (3) after petitioners purchased the Diane, the change in the international racing rules. The Diane was built under the IOR, the system that had been in place since the late 1960s and early 1970s. Petitioners could not have known that the rules would change 2 years after their purchase of the Diane. Although the Diane was still a competitive boat, it was less attractive to charterers because it was built under the old system.Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011