- 7 - petitioners are barred from challenging the existence or amount of their tax liability for 1996 and 1997. Goza v. Commissioner, supra at 182-183; Sego v. Commissioner, supra at 610. The notice of determination that the Appeals Office issued to the taxpayer husband in Sego v. Commissioner, supra at 605, stated in part, as follows: Challenges to the existence or amount of liability were raised * * * * * * * * * * The assessments are deemed correct because you have failed to present any credible evidence to overcome the Commissioner’s presumption of correctness. * * * In Sego v. Commissioner, supra, this Court held, inter alia, that section 6330(c)(2)(B) barred the taxpayers from challenging the existence or amount of their underlying tax liability in the judicial proceeding. In short, petitioners are statutorily barred from challenging the existence or amount of their income tax liability for 1996 and 1997 in this proceeding. Petitioners have failed to raise a spousal defense, make a valid challenge to the appropriateness of respondent’s intended collection action, or offer alternative means of collection. These issues are now deemed conceded. Rule 331(b)(4). Accordingly, in the absence of a valid issue for review, we conclude that respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law sustaining the notice of determination dated April 15, 2002.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011