Square D Company and Subsidiaries - Page 114

                                       - 93 -                                         
          LTIP payouts as earned ratably over the 3-year period covered by            
          the LTIP arrangements is reasonable, and we accept it.56  We                
          accordingly shall treat the Retained Executives’ 1992                       
          compensation for purposes of determining its reasonableness in              
          this case as including 33 percent of the LTIP payout covering the           
          period 1992-94, except in the case of Mr. Pugh, whose LTIP payout           
          covered only 1992 and 1993 and is therefore allocated 50 percent            
          to 1992.                                                                    
                         (iii) 1991 SRP Benefits                                      
               Petitioner made payments of 1991 SRP Benefits and related              
          interest totaling $4,191,053 to the Retained Executives in                  
          December 1992, under the terms of the 1991 Employment Agreements            
          as amended in 1992.  Petitioner deducted these amounts in 1992              
          and takes the position herein that these amounts were fully                 
          earned by the Retained Executives in 1992 because, unlike the               
          Retention Payments, they were not subject to clawback if a                  




               56 Ms. Meyer faults Mr. Rosenbloom’s inclusion on a pro rata           
          basis, arguing that if any amount of the LTIP payout is to be               
          included in the Retained Executives’ 1992 compensation, it should           
          be 20, not 33, percent, because the LTIP arrangements weighted              
          petitioner’s financial performance in 1992, 1993, and 1994 at 20,           
          30, and 50 percent, respectively, in computing the amount of an             
          LTIP award.                                                                 
               Without further evidence, we are not persuaded that ratable            
          inclusion should be supplanted by a weighted inclusion                      
          corresponding to the weighting of petitioners’s annual financial            
          performance used in computing the LTIP award.                               





Page:  Previous  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011