Estate of Albert Strangi, Deceased, Rosalie Gulig, Independent Executrix - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          SFLP and $24,551 for his stock in Stranco.  The total value of              
          the property held by SFLP as of the date of death was                       
          $11,100,922, to which discounts were applied in calculating the             
          reported fair market value.  The Form 706 also reflected other              
          assets of $238,301 (including household and personal items,                 
          vehicles, securities, certain receivables, and bank account                 
          balances totaling $762) and claimed deductions of $43,280 for               
          debts of decedent (including $5,161 for rents to SFLP) and                  
          $107,108 for expenses.                                                      
               In a statutory notice dated December 1, 1998, respondent               
          determined a deficiency in Federal estate tax of $2,545,826 and             
          an alternative deficiency in Federal gift tax of $1,629,947.  The           
          estate tax deficiency resulted in large part from respondent’s              
          conclusion that decedent’s interest in SFLP should be increased             
          by $4,386,613 (to $10,947,343) and his interest in Stranco should           
          be increased by $29,009 (to $53,560).                                       
               The proceedings in Strangi I were initiated in response to             
          the foregoing notice of deficiency.  Prior to trial, respondent             
          attempted by motion to raise section 2036 as an issue.  Strangi I           
          at 486.  That motion was denied as untimely.  Id.  With respect             
          to the remaining issues, we held in Strangi I at 486-493:                   
          (1) The partnership was valid under State law and would be                  
          recognized for estate tax purposes; (2) section 2703 did not                
          apply to the partnership agreement; (3) the transfer of assets to           






Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011