- 13 - SFLP and $24,551 for his stock in Stranco. The total value of the property held by SFLP as of the date of death was $11,100,922, to which discounts were applied in calculating the reported fair market value. The Form 706 also reflected other assets of $238,301 (including household and personal items, vehicles, securities, certain receivables, and bank account balances totaling $762) and claimed deductions of $43,280 for debts of decedent (including $5,161 for rents to SFLP) and $107,108 for expenses. In a statutory notice dated December 1, 1998, respondent determined a deficiency in Federal estate tax of $2,545,826 and an alternative deficiency in Federal gift tax of $1,629,947. The estate tax deficiency resulted in large part from respondent’s conclusion that decedent’s interest in SFLP should be increased by $4,386,613 (to $10,947,343) and his interest in Stranco should be increased by $29,009 (to $53,560). The proceedings in Strangi I were initiated in response to the foregoing notice of deficiency. Prior to trial, respondent attempted by motion to raise section 2036 as an issue. Strangi I at 486. That motion was denied as untimely. Id. With respect to the remaining issues, we held in Strangi I at 486-493: (1) The partnership was valid under State law and would be recognized for estate tax purposes; (2) section 2703 did not apply to the partnership agreement; (3) the transfer of assets toPage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011