- 2 - income tax for the taxable year 1999 in the amount of $2,091. The issues for decision are as follows: (1) Whether petitioner is entitled to a deduction for a dependency exemption for his son Christopher William Thompson. We hold that he is not. (2) Whether petitioner is entitled to head of household filing status. We hold that he is not. (3) Whether petitioner is entitled to an earned income credit. We hold that he is not. An adjustment to the amount of petitioner’s standard deduction is a purely mechanical matter, the resolution of which is dependent on our disposition of the disputed issue regarding petitioner’s filing status. Background2 Some of the facts have been stipulated, and they are so found.3 Petitioner resided in Chicago, Illinois, at the time that his petition was filed with the Court. 2 We decide the issues in this case without regard to the burden of proof. Accordingly, we need not decide whether the general rule of sec. 7491(a)(1) is applicable in this case. See Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438 (2001). 3 In the parties’ Stipulation of Facts, respondent reserved hearsay objections to three of petitioner’s exhibits. We overrule those objections at this time. However, we accord no weight to any unsupported and conclusory statement made in those exhibits.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011