- 5 - possible transaction involving petitioner, Mr. Walker, and the Happy Valley property. The pertinent parts of Young’s letter to Leavitt are as follows: I am writing this letter on behalf of my client, Claudia Walker, who has a significant post-decree tax question. * * * In the divorce decree from Clackamas County in November 1996, Ms. Walker was awarded a $500,000 judgment against Mr. Walker. The judgment is due one year from the date of the judgment. As long as it is paid when due, no interest will accrue on the judgment. * * * Five months later, Mr. Walker is running into financial difficulties and two of the properties, an apartment complex and some bare land, are in the process of being sold. * * * In regards to the bare land, Mr. Walker holds a one-quarter interest in the property with Mrs. Walker holding another one-quarter interest in the property. After that sale is made, Mr. Walker’s one-quarter interest should net him about $200,000 from the sale. The big question is, should Mr. Walker Quitclaim his * * * one-quarter interest in the bare land to Ms. Walker prior to the sale with a simple notation on the Quitclaim Deed that the consideration is a credit against the judgment owed to her for whatever amount she receives from the sale, who is responsible for the capital gains on Mr. Walker’s portion? Essentially, it boils down to if Mr. Walker transfers his interest in the real property to Mrs. Walker, is it a taxable event for him, which requires him to declare the capital gains, or whether the capital gains responsibility and the basis carries over to Mrs. Walker so she has to pay capital gains on the proceeds of the sale herself. Young sent a copy of this letter to petitioner, and she reviewed it. On April 29, 1997, Young faxed the letter that he had sent to Leavitt to Kelly Coburn (Coburn), petitioner’s accountant,Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011