- 12 - Trust, which is the plaintiff in the above-referenced refund action, owns its interest in Mr. Walker’s claim by virtue of an assignment made by Mr. Walker’s estate. Petitioner’s deficiency action and the refund action brought by the Walker Family Irrevocable Trust constitute what is known as a “whipsaw” position for respondent because of the inconsistent positions taken by the two parties with respect to the gain resulting from the sale of the Happy Valley property to Parker Development. OPINION Petitioner’s Gain on the Sale of the Happy Valley Property Petitioner contends that under section 1041 she is liable for tax on only 25 percent of the gain that resulted from the sale of the Happy Valley property to Parker Development. Section 1041 provides a broad rule of nonrecognition-of-gain treatment for sales, gifts, and other transfers of property between spouses or between former spouses and incident to divorce. Sec. 1041(a). The basic policy of section 1041 is to treat a husband and wife as one economic unit and to defer, but not eliminate, the recognition of any gain or loss on interspousal property transfers until the property is conveyed to a third party outside the economic unit. Blatt v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 77, 80 (1994). This policy extends to transfers of property between former spouses so long as the transfers take place incident to divorce. See sec. 1041(a)(2).Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011