Claudia F. Walker - Page 28

                                       - 28 -                                         
          be assumed to pay $60,000 in capital gains taxes on the sale of             
          the Happy Valley property to a third party and that the credit              
          received by Mr. Walker against his debt to her by reason of the             
          transfer would be reduced proportionately.                                  
               The compelling facts again are that petitioner had been                
          advised of the tax consequences of the transactions involving the           
          Happy Valley property before she entered into them.  She should             
          have provided Coburn with the Settlement Agreement and quitclaim            
          deed so that he could determine the proper tax treatment of                 
          Mr. Walker’s transfer of his 25-percent interest in the Happy               
          Valley property to her.  Because petitioner failed to provide               
          this information to Coburn and subsequently denied to him that              
          the transaction occurred, we conclude that petitioner’s efforts             
          to assess her proper tax liability were neither consistent with             
          reasonable cause nor in good faith.  See Weis v. Commissioner, 94           
          T.C. 473, 487 (1990); Pessin v. Commissioner, 59 T.C. 473, 489              
          (1972); Estate of Ballantyne v. Commissioner, supra; sec. 1.6664-           
          4(c)(1)(i), Income Tax Regs.; see also Nowak v. Commissioner,               
          T.C. Memo. 1994-428 (upholding imposition of negligence penalty             
          where taxpayers ignored competent tax advice given to them by               
          their accountant about proposed transaction).                               
          Conclusion                                                                  
               We hold that respondent did not err in his determination               
          that petitioner failed to report the correct amount of gain from            






Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011