Richard Wos - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          payer’s signature, and on which petitioner had made certain                 
          entries and had written certain language, including the phrase              
          “Without Prejudice” that appeared above his signature on that               
          document.  In petitioner’s document for 1996, petitioner showed             
          $9,237 of interest, $1,632 of dividend, $97,284 of capital gain,            
          $-803 with respect to rental real estate, and tax due of $25,624.           
          Petitioner did not include in petitioner’s document for 1996                
          Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business (Schedule C), or any               
          other schedule showing receipts and expenses with respect to the            
          washing machine repair business that petitioner conducted during            
          1996.                                                                       
               Respondent did not file petitioner’s document for 1996 as              
          petitioner’s tax return for that year.  Nor did respondent file a           
          tax return for petitioner for 1997.                                         
               Respondent issued to petitioner a notice for his taxable               
          years 1996 and 1997.  In that notice, respondent determined,                
          inter alia, that petitioner had Schedule C net profit subject to            
          tax of $67,703 and $116,306 for 1996 and 1997, respectively.                
          Respondent further determined in the notice that during 1997                
          petitioner received pension income of $3,852 and that he is                 
          liable for that year for the 10-percent additional tax under                
          section 72(t)(1) on that income (i.e., a 10-percent additional              
          tax under section 72(t)(1) of $385).  Respondent also determined            
          in the notice that petitioner is liable for each of the years at            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011